English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 25271/25866 (98%)
Visitors : 5344547      Online Users : 56
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ksu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/6201


    Title: 科技大學電子工程系學生數學解題能力指標建構與其學習成效之研究
    Authors: 支紹慈
    饒達欽
    賴柏洲
    張世熙
    張吉成
    王玉玲
    Keywords: 工程解題
    能力
    工程問題的數學解題能力指標
    engineering problem-solving
    ability
    competence indicators
    Date: 2009-07-31
    Issue Date: 2009-12-29 16:27:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究先探究數學問題解決及核心能力內涵理論,以工程問題的數學解題能力為核心,從理論面建立此能力指標之構面及要素。其次以專家訪談及諮詢修正指標。並以德懷術方法建構出此能力指標架構,完成具有普遍性原則的指標。接著以鷹架學習理論ZPD 概念,編製引導式回答題及其相關文件,對學生進行半結構式試探性評量及提出答題的看法,來修正與驗證能力指標之可行性。所得結論:1.建立四個層級架構與四項轉銜能力的構面與向度。2.建立工程問題數學解題能力43 項指標。3.「引導式回答題」之比對及作答方式,可評量電子工程問題的數學解題能力的強弱。4.能力指標具有連續且不可分割邏輯及權重值的差異。
    This research will first examine the problem-solving theories in mathematics and the core competence theory to establish competence indicators with dimensions and elements. And then, the indicators established based on the theories will be modified after interviews and consultations with experts and the structure will be built upon Delphi Technique to comply with the universal principle. Next, ZPD (the Zone of Proximal Development) theory will be applied to compile a list of leading questions and relative documents. Semi-structural testing evaluations will be proceeded on students and their views on how they answer questions will be collected, so as to modify and verify the feasibility of these competence indicators. The conclusions of this research include: 1. A structure of 4 tiers and 4 dimensions and aspects of transforming and connecting abilities; 2. 43 indicators of applying math problem-solving abilities to engineering problems; 3. an evaluation of the capability of applying math problem-solving abilities to engineering problems through comparing the "leading questions" and the nature of answering questions; 4. the continuous and inseparable logic nature of the competence indicators and the differences between the weight values.
    Appears in Collections:[資訊傳播系] 研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    972511S168003.pdf425KbAdobe PDF548View/Open


    All items in KSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    本網站之所有圖文內容授權為崑山科技大學圖書資訊館所有,請勿任意轉載或擷取使用。
    ©Kun Shan University Library and Information Center
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback